1 Introduction

Habitat fragmentation, the process by which large, continuous habitats are divided into smaller, isolated patches, is a significant driver of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation worldwide. This phenomenon is primarily driven by human activities such as urbanization, agriculture, and deforestation, which disrupt the continuity of natural landscapes and create isolated habitat remnants (Haddad et al., 2015; Miller-Rushing et al., 2019). The effects of habitat fragmentation are profound, leading to reduced species richness, altered community structures, and impaired ecosystem functions. Fragmentation not only reduces the total habitat area but also increases edge effects, which further degrade the quality of the remaining habitat patches (Aguilar et al., 2019). These changes can have cascading effects on biodiversity, as smaller and more isolated patches support fewer species and smaller populations, increasing the risk of local extinctions.

Reptiles, with their specific habitat requirements and limited dispersal abilities, are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Fragmentation can lead to reduced genetic diversity, lower reproductive success, and increased mortality rates in reptile populations (Delaney et al., 2021). Urbanization, a major contributor to habitat fragmentation, has been shown to significantly affect reptile diversity and abundance, with smaller patches often unable to support viable populations of certain species. Understanding the specific impacts of habitat fragmentation on reptiles is crucial for developing effective conservation strategies, as these species play important roles in ecosystem functioning, such as pest control and nutrient cycling.

This study is to examine the extent and nature of environmental fragmentation and its specific impacts on reptile biodiversity, assess the effectiveness of different conservation strategies, such as habitat restoration and the establishment of wildlife corridors, in mitigating the negative impacts of fragmentation, and identify key research gaps and future directions for habitat fragmentation and reptile conservation research, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges that habitat fragmentation poses to reptilian populations and to inform conservation efforts to conserve these important components of biodiversity.

2 Overview of Reptile Diversity and Distribution

2.1 Description of reptile families, genera, and species

Reptiles are a diverse group of vertebrates that include several families, genera, and species. The primary families include Squamata (lizards and snakes), Testudines (turtles and tortoises), Crocodylia (crocodiles and alligators), and Rhynchocephalia (tuataras). Within these families, there are numerous genera and species, each adapted to specific ecological niches. For instance, the family Scincidae (skinks) includes species like Lerista bougainvillii and Tiliqua rugosa, which are sensitive to habitat changes and rely heavily on native vegetation (Mulhall et al., 2022). In Brazil, the herpetofauna is particularly rich, with significant representation from Anura (frogs) and Testudines, although groups like Caudata (salamanders) and Crocodylia are less studied (Teixido et al., 2021).

2.2 Geographical distribution and habitat preferences of reptiles

Reptiles are distributed globally, occupying a wide range of habitats from tropical rainforests to arid deserts. Their distribution is often influenced by climate and landscape structure. For example, in Victoria, Australia, the extent of native vegetation is a critical factor influencing the distribution of many reptile species (Mulhall et al., 2022). In urban landscapes, reptile diversity and abundance are closely linked to the size and quality of habitat patches, with larger patches generally supporting higher species richness (Delaney et al., 2021). In the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, fragment area and matrix quality significantly affect reptile richness and abundance, highlighting the importance of preserving large, contiguous habitats (Lion et al., 2016).

2.3 Overview of the ecological roles reptiles play in various ecosystems

Reptiles play crucial ecological roles in various ecosystems. They act as both predators and prey, contributing to the regulation of insect and small mammal populations. For instance, lizards and snakes help control pest populations, while turtles and tortoises contribute to seed dispersal and vegetation dynamics. In fragmented landscapes, the ecological roles of reptiles can be significantly altered. For example, in fragmented forests of central Victoria, some species become more abundant in fragments, potentially due to changes in interspecific interactions (Lino et al., 2019). Similarly, in northeastern Costa Rica, lizard density increases in forest fragments, while frog density decreases, indicating shifts in community structure and ecological dynamics (Keinath et al., 2017).

3 Mechanisms of Habitat Fragmentation

3.1 Processes leading to habitat fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation is primarily driven by human activities such as urbanization, agriculture, and deforestation. Urbanization leads to the conversion of natural landscapes into cities and towns, resulting in the loss and fragmentation of habitats. This process is a significant threat to biodiversity, as seen in studies where urban development has led to the fragmentation of habitats, impacting reptile and amphibian populations (Delaney et al., 2021). Agriculture also plays a crucial role in habitat fragmentation by converting forests and other natural habitats into farmland, which reduces the size and connectivity of remaining habitat patches (McAlpine et al., 2015). Deforestation, often driven by logging and land conversion for agriculture, further exacerbates habitat fragmentation by creating isolated patches of forest surrounded by non-forest areas (Haddad et al., 2015).

3.2 Patterns and scales of habitat fragmentation across different landscapes

The patterns and scales of habitat fragmentation vary across different landscapes. In highly urbanized areas, habitat patches are often small and isolated, surrounded by roads, buildings, and other infrastructure (Aguilar et al., 2019). In agricultural landscapes, fragmentation can result in a mosaic of remnant and regrowth vegetation, with varying effects on species richness and abundance (McAlpine et al., 2015). The scale of fragmentation can range from local to global, with studies showing that 70% of the remaining forest is within 1 km of the forest edge, indicating widespread fragmentation. The effects of fragmentation are more pronounced in smaller and more isolated fragments, which experience greater biodiversity loss and ecosystem function impairment.

3.3 How habitat fragmentation alters landscape connectivity and quality

Habitat fragmentation significantly alters landscape connectivity and quality, impacting the movement and survival of species. Fragmentation reduces the size of habitat patches and increases the distance between them, which can hinder the dispersal of species and reduce genetic diversity (Rossetti et al., 2017). For example, studies on Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami) have shown that deforestation inhibits dispersal, particularly for females, leading to reduced gene flow and altered population structure. Fragmentation also degrades habitat quality by increasing edge effects, which can alter microclimates and increase exposure to predators and invasive species. The loss of connectivity and habitat quality can lead to population declines and increased extinction risk, highlighting the need for conservation strategies that enhance landscape connectivity and habitat quality.

4 Direct Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Reptile Populations

4.1 Impact on reptile movement patterns and home range sizes

Habitat fragmentation significantly affects the movement patterns and home range sizes of reptiles. For instance, the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus) exhibits larger home ranges and greater movement distances in unfragmented areas compared to fragmented ones. Roads and other barriers in fragmented habitats restrict their movements, effectively isolating populations and increasing the risk of localized extirpations (Young et al., 2018). Similarly, Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami) shows reduced dispersal in deforested areas compared to natural reserves, with females being more affected than males (Teixido et al., 2021). These changes in movement patterns can lead to decreased genetic diversity and altered population dynamics.

4.2 Effects on reptile reproductive success and population viability

Habitat fragmentation can also impact the reproductive success and overall viability of reptile populations. Fragmentation often leads to smaller, isolated populations that are more susceptible to genetic drift and inbreeding, which can reduce genetic diversity and fitness (Aguilar et al., 2008). For example, a global analysis found that reptiles, particularly habitat specialists, are highly sensitive to fragmentation, which can lead to decreased reproductive success and population viability (Keinath et al., 2017). The reduced genetic diversity in fragmented habitats can further exacerbate these issues, making populations less resilient to environmental changes and increasing their risk of extinction.

4.3 Increased vulnerability to predators and environmental stressors

Fragmented habitats often expose reptiles to increased predation and environmental stressors. Smaller and isolated habitat patches can make reptiles more vulnerable to predators due to the lack of adequate cover and escape routes. Additionally, fragmented habitats can lead to harsher environmental conditions, such as increased temperature fluctuations and reduced availability of resources. For instance, studies have shown that habitat fragmentation can lead to a decrease in species richness and abundance of reptiles in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, with smaller fragments being particularly detrimental (Aguilar et al., 2019). These increased vulnerabilities can further threaten the survival of reptile populations in fragmented landscapes.

5 Genetic Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation

5.1 Reduction in genetic diversity due to isolated populations

Habitat fragmentation often leads to the isolation of populations, which can significantly reduce genetic diversity. This reduction occurs because smaller, isolated populations are more susceptible to genetic drift, which can lead to the loss of alleles over time. For instance, a meta-analysis on mammals demonstrated a decrease in allelic diversity, allelic richness, and heterozygosity in fragmented habitats compared to continuous ones (Lino et al., 2019). Similarly, studies on the endangered Macquarie perch showed that most remaining populations have low genetic diversity and effective population sizes below the threshold required to retain adaptive potential (Pavlova et al., 2017). These findings underscore the critical impact of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity across various species.

5.2 Inbreeding depression and its effects on reptile health and adaptability

Inbreeding depression is a significant consequence of habitat fragmentation, as isolated populations are more likely to mate with close relatives, leading to an increase in homozygosity. This can expose deleterious recessive alleles, resulting in reduced fitness and adaptability. For example, in a fragmented lizard population, increased homozygosity was correlated with lower fitness, as evidenced by smaller adult body size and reduced clutch mass (Pérez-Tris et al., 2019). Additionally, simulations have shown that small populations with high levels of inbreeding depression face elevated extinction risks due to the exposure of strongly deleterious mutations (Figure 1) (Kyriazis et al., 2019; Kyriazis et al., 2021). These studies highlight the detrimental effects of inbreeding depression on the health and adaptability of reptile populations in fragmented habitats.

5.3 Case studies highlighting genetic bottlenecks in fragmented reptile populations

Several case studies illustrate the genetic bottlenecks experienced by reptile populations in fragmented habitats. The pygmy bluetongue lizard, for example, has shown restricted gene flow and significant genetic differentiation between isolated sample sites, despite no evidence of population bottlenecks or inbreeding. This restricted gene flow can lead to genetic bottlenecks, where the genetic diversity of a population is drastically reduced (Khan et al., 2021). Another study on the lizard Psammodromus algirus found that individuals in smaller habitat fragments had greater homozygosity and lower fitness, indicating a genetic bottleneck effect (Aguilar et al., 2019). These case studies provide concrete examples of how habitat fragmentation can lead to genetic bottlenecks in reptile populations, further emphasizing the need for effective conservation strategies.

6 Behavioral Adaptations to Fragmented Habitats

6.1 Changes in foraging behavior and dietary shifts

Habitat fragmentation often leads to significant changes in the availability and distribution of food resources, which can force reptiles to adapt their foraging behavior and dietary preferences. For instance, studies have shown that nocturnal lemurs in fragmented forests exhibit dietary plasticity, adjusting their feeding habits to the available food sources within their habitat. This adaptability allows them to survive despite the reduced availability of fruits and flowers in fragmented areas compared to continuous forests (Hending et al., 2023). Similarly, insect herbivores in fragmented habitats experience changes in community richness and abundance, which can indirectly affect the foraging behavior of reptiles that prey on these insects (Rossetti et al., 2017).

6.2 Alterations in thermoregulation and habitat selection

Thermoregulation is a critical aspect of reptile behavior that can be significantly impacted by habitat fragmentation. In fragmented landscapes, the spatial distribution of thermal resources can become more clumped, making it more challenging for reptiles to find suitable microhabitats for thermoregulation. For example, the Mediterranean lacertid lizard Psammodromus algirus shows precise and efficient thermoregulation in fragmented habitats, but the cost of thermoregulation is higher in evergreen fragments due to the more clumped distribution of sunlit and shaded patches (Llanos-Garrido et al., 2023). Additionally, the quality of the habitat, rather than the degree of fragmentation, has been found to be a better predictor of lizard distribution, with lizards preferring deciduous woodlands that offer better conditions for thermoregulation and foraging (Teixido et al., 2021).

6.3 Potential for behavioral plasticity to mitigate the effects of fragmentation

Behavioral plasticity, or the ability of an organism to modify its behavior in response to environmental changes, can play a crucial role in mitigating the negative effects of habitat fragmentation. Reptiles that exhibit high levels of behavioral plasticity are more likely to adapt to the altered conditions of fragmented habitats. For instance, the demographic model developed to study the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness highlights the importance of movement behavior traits. Species with high searching propensity and large inherent searching distances can better cope with fine-scale fragmentation by selecting suitable habitats, thereby mitigating the impact on their fitness (Cattarino et al., 2016). Moreover, the adaptability of nocturnal lemurs to dietary changes in fragmented habitats underscores the potential for behavioral plasticity to support survival in suboptimal environments (Hending et al., 2023).

5.3 Case studies highlighting genetic bottlenecks in fragmented reptile populations

Several case studies illustrate the genetic bottlenecks experienced by reptile populations in fragmented habitats. The pygmy bluetongue lizard, for example, has shown restricted gene flow and significant genetic differentiation between isolated sample sites, despite no evidence of population bottlenecks or inbreeding. This restricted gene flow can lead to genetic bottlenecks, where the genetic diversity of a population is drastically reduced (Khan et al., 2021). Another study on the lizard Psammodromus algirus found that individuals in smaller habitat fragments had greater homozygosity and lower fitness, indicating a genetic bottleneck effect (Aguilar et al., 2019). These case studies provide concrete examples of how habitat fragmentation can lead to genetic bottlenecks in reptile populations, further emphasizing the need for effective conservation strategies.

6 Behavioral Adaptations to Fragmented Habitats

6.1 Changes in foraging behavior and dietary shifts

Habitat fragmentation often leads to significant changes in the availability and distribution of food resources, which can force reptiles to adapt their foraging behavior and dietary preferences. For instance, studies have shown that nocturnal lemurs in fragmented forests exhibit dietary plasticity, adjusting their feeding habits to the available food sources within their habitat. This adaptability allows them to survive despite the reduced availability of fruits and flowers in fragmented areas compared to continuous forests (Hending et al., 2023). Similarly, insect herbivores in fragmented habitats experience changes in community richness and abundance, which can indirectly affect the foraging behavior of reptiles that prey on these insects (Rossetti et al., 2017).

6.2 Alterations in thermoregulation and habitat selection

Thermoregulation is a critical aspect of reptile behavior that can be significantly impacted by habitat fragmentation. In fragmented landscapes, the spatial distribution of thermal resources can become more clumped, making it more challenging for reptiles to find suitable microhabitats for thermoregulation. For example, the Mediterranean lacertid lizard Psammodromus algirus shows precise and efficient thermoregulation in fragmented habitats, but the cost of thermoregulation is higher in evergreen fragments due to the more clumped distribution of sunlit and shaded patches (Llanos-Garrido et al., 2023). Additionally, the quality of the habitat, rather than the degree of fragmentation, has been found to be a better predictor of lizard distribution, with lizards preferring deciduous woodlands that offer better conditions for thermoregulation and foraging (Teixido et al., 2021).

6.3 Potential for behavioral plasticity to mitigate the effects of fragmentation

Behavioral plasticity, or the ability of an organism to modify its behavior in response to environmental changes, can play a crucial role in mitigating the negative effects of habitat fragmentation. Reptiles that exhibit high levels of behavioral plasticity are more likely to adapt to the altered conditions of fragmented habitats. For instance, the demographic model developed to study the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness highlights the importance of movement behavior traits. Species with high searching propensity and large inherent searching distances can better cope with fine-scale fragmentation by selecting suitable habitats, thereby mitigating the impact on their fitness (Cattarino et al., 2016). Moreover, the adaptability of nocturnal lemurs to dietary changes in fragmented habitats underscores the potential for behavioral plasticity to support survival in suboptimal environments (Hending et al., 2023).

7.3 Conservation efforts and their effectiveness in preserving this species

Various conservation efforts have been implemented to mitigate the effects of habitat fragmentation on Gopher Tortoise populations. These include habitat management practices such as prescribed burning and mechanical clearing to maintain suitable habitat conditions (Rossetti et al., 2017). Long-term monitoring and population studies have shown that these management practices can improve habitat quality and support population recovery. For example, populations in well-managed sites with regular fire regimes exhibit higher survival rates and more stable demographics compared to those in poorly managed areas (Santos et al., 2008).

Additionally, conservation strategies have focused on enhancing habitat connectivity through the creation of wildlife corridors and the protection of critical habitats. The use of spatial models like FRAGGLE helps identify key habitat patches and corridors essential for maintaining population connectivity. However, the effectiveness of these strategies can vary. For instance, while some Gopher Tortoises have adapted to urban environments, they often avoid developed areas and prefer undeveloped lots, indicating that urban landscapes may not fully support their long-term survival.

8 Conservation Strategies to Mitigate Habitat Fragmentation

8.1 Landscape-level conservation approaches (e.g., wildlife corridors, habitat restoration)

Landscape-level conservation approaches are essential to mitigate the adverse effects of habitat fragmentation on reptile populations. These strategies include the creation and maintenance of wildlife corridors, which facilitate the movement and genetic exchange between isolated populations. Habitat restoration efforts, such as reforestation and the rehabilitation of degraded lands, are also crucial in enhancing landscape connectivity and providing suitable habitats for reptiles (Clostio et al., 2012).

Wildlife corridors have been shown to be effective in maintaining biodiversity by connecting fragmented habitats, thus allowing species to move freely and access different resources (Haddad et al., 2015). Habitat restoration, on the other hand, helps in re-establishing native vegetation and improving habitat quality, which is vital for the survival of many reptile species (Mulhall et al., 2022). These landscape-level approaches not only support reptile populations but also contribute to the overall health of ecosystems by maintaining ecological processes and functions.

8.2 Role of protected areas in maintaining reptile populations

Protected areas play a significant role in conserving reptile populations by providing safe havens where human activities are limited or regulated. These areas help in preserving critical habitats and ensuring the long-term survival of species that are sensitive to habitat fragmentation. Studies have shown that large conservation parks and reserves harbor higher reptile species richness and abundance compared to small, isolated fragments (Keinath et al., 2017).

The establishment of protected areas is particularly important in regions with high biodiversity, such as the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, where habitat fragmentation has severely impacted reptile populations (Teixido et al., 2021). By maintaining large, contiguous habitats, protected areas can support viable populations and reduce the risk of local extinctions. Additionally, the management of these areas should focus on maintaining habitat quality and connectivity to further enhance their conservation value.

8.3 Community-based conservation initiatives and their impact on habitat preservation

Community-based conservation initiatives involve local communities in the management and protection of natural habitats. These initiatives can be highly effective in preserving reptile habitats and mitigating the effects of fragmentation. By engaging local stakeholders, conservation efforts can be tailored to address specific threats and leverage local knowledge and resources.

Community involvement in conservation has been shown to improve habitat preservation and biodiversity outcomes. For example, in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, community-based initiatives have helped in maintaining small habitat fragments, which are valuable for the conservation of reptile species (Lion et al., 2016). These small patches, although limited in size, can serve as microreserves and contribute to the overall connectivity of the landscape (Delaney et al., 2021).

Moreover, community-based conservation can foster a sense of stewardship and responsibility among local residents, leading to more sustainable land-use practices and reduced habitat destruction. By integrating local communities into conservation planning and decision-making, it is possible to achieve more effective and long-lasting conservation outcomes for reptile populations and their habitats.

9 Policy and Management Recommendations

9.1 The role of environmental policies in addressing habitat fragmentation

Environmental policies play a crucial role in mitigating the adverse effects of habitat fragmentation on reptile populations. Effective policies should aim to preserve existing habitats, restore degraded areas, and enhance landscape connectivity. For instance, policies that enforce the protection of large contiguous habitats and the establishment of wildlife corridors can significantly reduce the negative impacts of fragmentation (Haddad et al., 2015). Additionally, integrating habitat conservation into broader land-use policies can help balance development needs with ecological preservation, ensuring that critical habitats are not isolated or destroyed (Teixido et al., 2021).

9.2 Best practices for integrating habitat connectivity into land-use planning

Integrating habitat connectivity into land-use planning involves several best practices. Firstly, identifying and prioritizing key habitats and corridors that facilitate species movement is essential. This can be achieved through spatial planning tools and ecological modeling to predict the impacts of land-use changes on habitat connectivity (Aguilar et al., 2019). Secondly, maintaining and enhancing the quality of the matrix surrounding habitat fragments can support species dispersal and reduce the isolation of populations. Implementing buffer zones and promoting land uses that are compatible with conservation goals, such as agroforestry or sustainable agriculture, can also contribute to maintaining connectivity. Lastly, involving local communities and stakeholders in conservation planning ensures that land-use decisions are socially acceptable and economically viable, thereby enhancing the long-term success of connectivity initiatives.

9.3 Case examples of successful policy interventions for reptile conservation

Several case studies highlight the success of policy interventions in reptile conservation. In the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, policies that protect small forest fragments have been shown to support reptile diversity and abundance, demonstrating the importance of even small habitat patches in conservation efforts. Another example is the establishment of protected areas and wildlife corridors in Australia, which has helped maintain genetic diversity and population connectivity in species like Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami) (Fletcher et al., 2018). These interventions underscore the effectiveness of targeted conservation policies in mitigating the impacts of habitat fragmentation and promoting the resilience of reptile populations. Furthermore, global initiatives that focus on restoring landscape connectivity, such as reforestation projects and the creation of ecological networks, have proven beneficial in reducing biodiversity loss and enhancing ecosystem functions. These examples illustrate that well-designed and implemented policies can significantly contribute to the conservation of reptile populations in fragmented landscapes.

10 Concluding Remarks

Habitat fragmentation significantly reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among reptile populations, leading to potential genetic drift and localized extinctions. Reptiles, particularly habitat specialists and larger species, are more sensitive to fragmentation compared to other vertebrate classes. Fragment size and quality of the surrounding matrix are critical factors influencing species richness, abundance, and occurrence probabilities. Urbanization exacerbates these effects, with smaller patches showing reduced species diversity and abundance over time. Despite these challenges, small habitat patches can still hold conservation value, acting as microreserves for certain species.

The implications for the future of reptile conservation in fragmented landscapes are profound. Conservation strategies must prioritize maintaining and enhancing habitat connectivity to mitigate genetic isolation and support gene flow among populations. Special attention should be given to habitat specialists and larger-bodied reptiles, which are more vulnerable to fragmentation. Additionally, urban planning should incorporate green spaces and corridors to preserve biodiversity within metropolitan areas.

Recommendations for further research include a focus on less-studied taxonomic groups and non-forest biomes to gain a comprehensive understanding of fragmentation effects across different ecosystems. Long-term monitoring is essential to assess the temporal dynamics of reptile populations in fragmented habitats. Policy development should aim to protect and restore habitat connectivity, promote sustainable land-use practices, and integrate biodiversity conservation into urban planning. By addressing these research gaps and implementing informed policies, we can enhance the resilience of reptile populations in fragmented landscapes.

Acknowledgments

EcoEvo Publisher sincerely thanks to the two peer reviewers for their valuable feedback on this study.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Aguilar R., Cristóbal‐Perez E., Balvino‐Olvera F., Aguilar-Aguilar M., Aguirre-Acosta N., Ashworth L., Lobo J., Martén-Rodríguez S., Fuchs E., Sánchez-Montoya G., Bernardello G., and Quesada M., 2019, Habitat fragmentation reduces plant progeny quality: a global synthesis, Ecology letters, 22(7): 1163-1173.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13272

PMid:31087604

Aguilar R., Quesada M., Ashworth L., Herrerías-Diego Y., and Lobo J., 2008, Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches, Molecular Ecology, 17(24): 5177-5188.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x

PMid:19120995

Blonder B., Liedtke K., and Stephens S., 2021, Changes in coastal gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow characteristics and density following hurricane events in Northeast Florida USA: Implications for conservation planning, Global Ecology and Conservation, 25: e01437.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01437

Cattarino L., McAlpine C., and Rhodes J., 2016, Spatial scale and movement behaviour traits control the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness, The Journal of animal ecology, 85(1): 168-177.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12427

PMid:26250334

Clostio R., Martinez A., LeBlanc K., and Anthony N., 2012, Population genetic structure of a threatened tortoise across the south‐eastern United States: implications for conservation management, Animal Conservation, 15(6): 613-625.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00557.x

Cooney B., Elhassani D., Frazier E., and Caruso J., 2016, A comparative survey of Gopherus polyphemus hemoparasites in four different South Florida habitats, The Journal of Immunology, 96(1): 216-5.

https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.196.supp.216.5

Delaney K., Busteed G., Fisher R., and Riley S., 2021, Reptile and Amphibian Diversity and Abundance in an Urban Landscape: Impacts of Fragmentation and the Conservation Value of Small Patches, Ichthyology and Herpetology, 109: 424-435.

https://doi.org/10.1643/h2019261

Fletcher R., Didham R., Banks‐Leite C., Barlow J., Ewers R., Rosindell J., Holt R., Gonzalez A., Pardini R., Damschen E., Melo F., Ries L., Prevedello J., Tscharntke T., Laurance W., Lovejoy T., and Haddad N., 2018, Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 226: 9-15.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2018.07.022

Haddad N., Brudvig L., Clobert J., Davies K., Gonzalez A., Holt R., Lovejoy T., Sexton J., Austin M., Collins C., Cook W., Damschen E., Ewers R., Foster B., Jenkins C., King A., Laurance W., Levey D., Margules C., Melbourne B., Nicholls A., Orrock J., Song D., and Townshend J., 2015, Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems, Science Advances, 1(2): e1500052.

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052

PMid:26601154 PMCid:PMC4643828

Hending D., Randrianarison H., Andriamavosoloarisoa N., Ranohatra-Hending C., Cotton S., Holderied M., and McCabe G., 2023, Effects of forest fragmentation on the dietary ecology and activity of a nocturnal lemur community in North West Madagascar, American journal of primatology, e23569.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23569

PMid:37899689

Khan A., Patel K., Shukla H., Viswanathan A., Valk T., Borthakur U., Nigam P., Zachariah A., Jhala Y., Kardos M., and Ramakrishnan U., 2021, Genomic evidence for inbreeding depression and purging of deleterious genetic variation in Indian tigers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(49): e2023018118.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023018118

PMid:34848534 PMCid:PMC8670471

Keinath D., Doak D., Hodges K., Prugh L., Fagan W., Şekercioğlu Ç., Buchart S., and Kauffman M., 2017, A global analysis of traits predicting species sensitivity to habitat fragmentation, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26: 115-127.

https://doi.org/10.1111/GEB.12509

Kyriazis C., Wayne R., and Lohmueller K., 2021, Strongly deleterious mutations are a primary determinant of extinction risk due to inbreeding depression, Evolution Letters, 5(1): 33-47.

https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.209

PMid:33552534 PMCid:PMC7857301

Lino A., Fonseca C., Rojas D., Fischer E., and Pereira M., 2019, A meta-analysis of the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic diversity in mammals, Mammalian Biology, 94: 69-76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MAMBIO.2018.09.006

Lion M., Garda A., Santana D., and Fonseca C., 2016, The conservation value of small fragments for atlantic forest reptiles, Biotropica, 48(2): 265-275.

https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12277

Llanos-Garrido A., Santos T., and Díaz J., 2023, Negative effects of the spatial clumping of thermal resources on lizard thermoregulation in a fragmented habitat, Journal of Thermal Biology, 115: 103604.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4374691

PMid:37421838

McAlpine C., Bowen M., Smith G., Gramotnev G., Smith A., Cascio A., Goulding W., and Maron M., 2015, Reptile abundance but not species richness increases with regrowth age and spatial extent in fragmented agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia, Biological Conservation, 184: 174-181.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.01.010

Metcalf M., Johnson J., Cooper A., Marsh A., Gunnels C., and Herman J., 2023, Movement ecology of gopher tortoises in a residential neighborhood in Southwest Florida, Southeastern Naturalist, 22: 154-169.

https://doi.org/10.1656/058.022.0203

Miller‐Rushing A., Primack R., Devictor V., Corlett R., Cumming G., Loyola R., Maas B., and Pejchar L., 2019, How does habitat fragmentation affect biodiversity? A controversial question at the core of conservation biology, Biological Conservation, 232: 271-273.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2018.12.029

Mulhall S., Sitters H., and Stefano J., 2022, Vegetation cover and configuration drive reptile species distributions in a fragmented landscape, Wildlife Research, 50: 792-806.

https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21063

Pavlova A., Beheregaray L., Coleman R., Gilligan D., Harrisson K., Ingram B., Kearns J., Lamb A., Lintermans M., Lyon J., Nguyen T., Sasaki M., Tonkin Z., Yen J., and Sunnucks P., 2017, Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: a call for assisted gene flow, Evolutionary Applications, 10: 531-550.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12484

PMid:28616062 PMCid:PMC5469170

Pérez‐Tris J., Llanos-Garrido A., Bloor P., Carbonell R., Tellería J., Santos T., and Díaz J., 2019, Increased individual homozygosity is correlated with low fitness in a fragmented lizard population, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 128(4): 952-962.

https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz144

Rautsaw R., Martin S., Lanctot K., Vincent B., Bolt M., Seigel R., and Parkinson C., 2018, On the road again: assessing the use of roadsides as wildlife corridors for gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), Journal of Herpetology, 52: 136-144.

https://doi.org/10.1670/17-013

Rossetti M., Tscharntke T., Aguilar R., and Batáry P., 2017, Responses of insect herbivores and herbivory to habitat fragmentation: a hierarchical meta-analysis., Ecology letters, 20(2): 264-272.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12723

PMid:28111900

Santos T., Diaz J., Pérez‐Tris J., Carbonell R., and Tellería J., 2008, Habitat quality predicts the distribution of a lizard in fragmented woodlands better than habitat fragmentation, Animal Conservation, 11(1): 46-56.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00146.x

Teixido A., Sehn H., Quintanilla L., Gonçalves S., Férnandez‐Arellano G., Dáttilo W., Izzo T., Layme V., and Moreira L., 2021, A meta‐analysis of the effects of fragmentation on the megadiverse herpetofauna of Brazil, Biotropica, 53(3): 726-737.

https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12955

Tuberville T., Todd B., Hermann S., Michener W., and Guyer C., 2014, Survival demography and growth of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) from three study sites with different management histories, Journal of Wildlife Management, 78: 1151-1160.

https://doi.org/10.1002/JWMG.773

Young M., Ryberg W., FitzGerald L., and Hibbitts T., 2018, Fragmentation alters home range and movements of the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus), Canadian Journal of Zoology, 96(8): 905-912.

https://doi.org/10.1139/CJZ-2017-0048